Pricing & engagement
Plainly: engagements are monthly retainers scaled to scope, never billed by the hour, and almost always start with a fixed-fee diagnostic so you can see the value before committing further. The point of ‘fractional’ is senior operating leadership at a fraction of a full-time executive’s cost.
01Three ways to engage
Fixed fee · start here
The diagnostic
A short, defined engagement — usually two to four weeks — that gives you an evidenced read on your operating model and a clear view of what a fuller engagement would address. Low commitment, no obligation to continue. Most engagements begin here.
Monthly · the core engagement
Embedded retainer
One to three days a week over six to twelve months, scaled to the scope and cadence the business needs. This is where the operating model, quality systems and governance get built and run — and then handed back. Billed monthly, month to month.
Fixed scope · a specific problem
Scoped project
A defined piece of work with a measurable target — a quality audit, a single process transformation, a governance scorecard stood up. Right when you have one clear problem rather than a broad operating mandate.
02What drives the cost
Priced to the problem, not the hours.
There is no rate card because no two operating models are the same. A few things shape where an engagement lands:
- 01
The cadence — how many days a week the work genuinely needs.
- 02
The scope — one process, or the whole operating model.
- 03
The stage and complexity — team size, number of entities, global footprint.
- 04
The duration — most engagements run six to twelve months.
03How to think about the return
The honest way to judge the cost is against the cost of the problem it removes. A two-month billing cycle ties up cash; quality that slips under load costs clients; decisions that wait on one person cost momentum. Those are real numbers, and they are usually far larger than the fee.
Because the work installs measurement, the return becomes visible in the metrics you steer by — decision latency, throughput, quality score, cycle time — not just in how the business feels. We agree those measures up front, so you can see whether it is working.
04What the retainer buys
An operating seat, not a list of deliverables.
The fee covers access to senior operating discipline, applied to whatever the business needs most — not a fixed scope that ignores how priorities shift.
- 01
An embedded operating seat — I sit inside the leadership team and make the decisions I am given authority to make.
- 02
The operating cadence: a weekly rhythm where the few numbers that matter are reviewed and decisions are closed.
- 03
Unambiguous ownership of every critical process, and the escalation paths that go with it.
- 04
A leadership scorecard with each metric defined on a single source of truth.
- 05
The quality and governance layer — review gates, thresholds and decision rights.
- 06
Documented playbooks and a clean transfer, so the model holds after the engagement ends.
05How the pricing works, in full
The diagnostic, then a retainer scaled to scope
Almost every engagement opens with a fixed-fee diagnostic — a short, low-commitment window that produces a written read on the operating model and a clear recommendation. If we continue, the work moves to a monthly retainer scaled to the cadence and scope the business actually needs. The two steps are deliberate. The diagnostic is what lets me quote a retainer against reality rather than a guess, and it lets you see the value before committing further. A scoped project sits alongside both for companies with one contained problem rather than a broad operating mandate. Three shapes, one principle: you pay for the work the problem genuinely requires, and nothing more.
Why never by the hour
Billing by time rewards slowness. The longer the work takes, the more it pays — which quietly aligns the adviser against the outcome you are paying for. A monthly retainer inverts that: I am paid to install an operating model that holds, not to accumulate hours. It also removes the friction of metering every call and message, so you use the access freely rather than rationing it for fear of the meter. This is not a billing preference; it is a statement about what the engagement is for. The unit of value here is a running operating model, not a timesheet, and the fee structure is built to keep both sides pointed at the same result.
What drives where the fee lands
There is no rate card because no two operating models are the same, and a generic price would either overcharge a simple engagement or under-resource a complex one. Four things shape where an engagement lands: the cadence, meaning how many days a week the work genuinely needs; the scope, from a single process to the whole operating model; the stage and complexity, including team size, the number of entities and how global the footprint is; and the duration, since most engagements run six to twelve months. The cadence is usually heavier during diagnosis and installation and lighter as ownership transfers to your team, and the retainer can flex with that rather than staying fixed while the work changes shape.
Judging the cost against the cost of the problem
The honest way to weigh the fee is against the cost of the problem it removes. A billing cycle that takes two months rather than fifteen days ties up cash that could be working. Quality that slips under load costs clients and triggers rework. Decisions that queue behind one person cost momentum that compounds across a quarter. Those are real numbers, and they are usually far larger than the fee. None of this is hypothetical — compressing a billing cycle from roughly two months to fifteen days across 75 entities and more than 2,000 employees, or lifting a quality score from 95% to 99% across thousands of campaigns, are the kinds of outcomes that dwarf the cost of the work that produced them.
Why the return is visible, not asserted
Because the work installs measurement as it goes, the return shows up in the metrics you steer by rather than only in how the business feels. We agree the measures up front — usually decision latency, throughput, a quality score and cycle time — and review them on a fixed cadence. That does two things. It keeps me accountable to a result you can see, and it gives you a defensible read to take to a board or an investor who wants more than a confident story. A fee justified by a felt improvement is hard to defend. A fee justified by a measured one, against a baseline you set together, is not.
A structure built so you are never trapped
The whole structure is designed to stay reversible. The diagnostic is low-commitment by design. The retainer is billed monthly, month to month, rather than locked into a long contract — so the engagement has to keep earning its place. The cadence flexes as your team takes ownership, and a scoped project is available when an ongoing seat is more than you need. Compared with a full-time COO — a permanent salary, bonus, equity and the cost and risk of recruiting, committed before you know the seat is warranted — a fractional engagement lets you buy the capability without buying the permanence. When the model is installed and your team can run it, the work winds down cleanly rather than becoming a seat you now have to keep filled.
Questions about pricing and engagement
The questions founders and operators ask most often before committing.
Because the hour is the wrong unit. Billing by time rewards slowness — the longer the work takes, the more it pays, which quietly aligns the adviser against the outcome you actually want. A monthly retainer rewards the result instead: I am paid to install an operating model that holds, not to log hours. It also removes the friction of metering every call and message, so you use the access freely rather than rationing it. The retainer reflects the seniority of the work and the access you get, and it is deliberately a fraction of a full-time executive package because the time is fractional, not the discipline.
It is a short, defined engagement — usually two to four weeks — with a fixed fee and a fixed window agreed up front. There is no open-ended commitment and no obligation to continue. I go inside the work, map how it really flows, and hand you a written, board-ready read on where the operating model is under strain, what that is costing, and what to fix first. Most engagements begin here because it lets you judge the fit and the value before committing further. Some companies take the findings and run with them alone — that is a perfectly good outcome, and the diagnostic is priced to stand on its own.
Four things, mostly. The cadence — how many days a week the work genuinely needs. The scope — whether we are fixing one process or owning the whole operating model. The stage and complexity — team size, number of entities, global footprint, how much is board- or investor-facing. And the duration, since most engagements run six to twelve months. There is no rate card because no two operating models are the same, and a generic price would either overcharge a simple engagement or under-resource a complex one. The diagnostic is what lets me quote a retainer against reality rather than a guess.
Judge the cost against the cost of the problem it removes. A billing cycle that runs two months instead of fifteen days ties up cash that could be working. Quality that slips under load costs clients and rework. Decisions that wait on one person cost momentum that compounds. Those are real numbers, and they are usually far larger than the fee. Because the work installs measurement, the return becomes visible in the metrics you steer by — decision latency, throughput, quality score, cycle time — rather than only in how the business feels. We agree those measures up front, so you can see whether it is working instead of taking my word for it.
The retainer covers an embedded operating seat, not a set of deliverables billed piecemeal. In practice that means the weekly operating cadence, unambiguous ownership of critical processes, a leadership scorecard on a single source of truth, the quality and governance layer, and the documented playbooks that make the model transferable. I am board- and investor-facing where the engagement needs it. The point is access to senior operating discipline, applied to whatever the business needs most that month, rather than a fixed scope that ignores how priorities shift. As ownership transfers to your team, the cadence usually lightens — and the retainer can flex with it.
Yes to both. Almost everyone starts with the fixed-fee diagnostic, which is deliberately low-commitment. If we continue, the retainer is billed monthly, month to month — not locked into a long contract — so the engagement has to keep earning its place. The cadence is set by what the business needs and flexes over time: heavier during installation, lighter as your team takes ownership. If a scoped project is the right shape instead of an ongoing seat, we do that. The structure is built so you are never paying for more than the work genuinely requires, and never trapped if priorities change.
A full-time COO is a permanent executive salary plus bonus, equity, benefits and the cost and risk of recruiting for the seat — a large fixed commitment made before you know whether the operating model even needs a permanent owner yet. A fractional engagement gives you the same discipline a few days a week, for as long as you need it, at a fraction of that total package because the time is fractional. It is also reversible: when the model is installed and your team can run it, the engagement winds down rather than becoming a seat you now have to keep filled. You buy the capability without buying the permanence.
Yes, when you have one clear problem rather than a broad operating mandate. A scoped project is a defined piece of work with a measurable target — a quality audit, a single process transformation, a governance scorecard stood up — with a fixed scope and a clear end. It suits companies that know exactly what they need and do not require an ongoing operating seat. Many start with a project and move to a retainer once they see the value; others stay with discrete projects. The diagnostic helps decide which shape fits, because the right structure depends on whether the problem is contained or systemic.